Are two heads better than one? exploring two-party conversations for car navigation voice guidance
College
College of Computer Studies
Department/Unit
Software Technology
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Source Title
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings
Publication Date
4-25-2020
Abstract
© 2020 Owner/Author. Voice guidance for car navigation typically considers drivers as docile actors. Recent works highlight limitations to this assumption which make drivers rely less on given directions. To explore how drivers can make better navigation decisions, we conducted a pilot Wizard-of-Oz study that gives turn suggestions in conversations between two voice agents. We asked 30 participants to drive in a simulation environment using voice guidance that gives three types of suggestions: familiar, optimal, and new routes. We examined their route choices, perceived workload and utterances while driving. We found that while most drivers followed directions appropriate for the given scenarios, they were more likely to make inappropriate choices after hearing alternatives in conversations. On the other hand, two-party conversations allowed drivers to better reflect on their choices after trips. We conclude by discussing preliminary design implications for car navigation voice guidance specifically and recommender systems in general.
html
Digitial Object Identifier (DOI)
10.1145/3334480.3382818
Recommended Citation
Samson, B. V., & Sumi, Y. (2020). Are two heads better than one? exploring two-party conversations for car navigation voice guidance. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382818
Upload File
wf_yes