History and international relations theories: From historical "narratives" to analytic "narratives"
College
College of Liberal Arts
Department/Unit
International Studies
Document Type
Book Chapter
Source Title
English School Theory and International Relations History Research
First Page
383
Last Page
397
Publication Date
2011
Publisher
Peking University Press
Abstract
Many social science scholars, including international relations scholars, pay little attention to the importance of historical narrative. Mainstream social science attaches great importance to universal theories that can explain most political phenomena with rigorous and simple causal relationships, while historical methodologies that help describe and explain human behavior are marginalized. Therefore, whether and when history is important has become a topic of endless debate among social science scholars when observing and analyzing human affairs. History has always been valuable only when it provides a law-like explanation for the study of recurring political behaviors. In other words, history itself has been neglected because historians prefer to study historical events in chronological order. This article argues that history plays a key role in the future development of international relations theory and in providing an alternative theoretical framework that can better understand the international order in particular regions. [translated from Chinese]
html
Recommended Citation
Ham, M., & Tolentino, E. N. (2011). History and international relations theories: From historical "narratives" to analytic "narratives". English School Theory and International Relations History Research, 383-397. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/13355
Disciplines
History | International Relations
Keywords
International relations; Narrative inquiry (Research method)
Upload File
wf_no