Date of Publication

2022

Document Type

Dissertation/Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science in Computer Science

College

College of Computer Studies

Department/Unit

Software Technology

Thesis Advisor

Briane Paul V. Samson

Defense Panel Chair

Macario Cordel, II

Defense Panel Member

Unisse Chua

Briane Paul V. Samson

Abstract/Summary

This paper investigates the effects of incorporating driving suitability as an added factor when generating routes for driving navigation on a person's route choice behavior. Mobile navigation apps being used by millions of people around the world focus on optimizing routes in terms of travel time and cost. Past research have shown that there are other factors that contribute to a driver's route choice, such as comfort and safety, among others. Using remote sensing, we determined the driving suitability of roads by combining safety and comfort scores for road images in various areas of Metro Manila on a scale of 0-10. To do this, we first crowdsourced safety and comfort ratings for road images to be used as labels. Then, for comfort, we trained a CNN based on U-Net to detect various road surface irregularities. For safety, we calculated the perceived lighting of various regions of road images. We then trained regression models to determine the relationship of these detected features with the crowdsourced labels and predict scores for our road network. We were able to produce models with an RMSE of 1.16 and 1.27 for comfort and safety scores respectively which were within acceptable levels. We incorporated the predicted scores into as factors when generating routes for a proof-of-concept mobile app. Next, we conducted a field study where 17 drivers used the mobile app in their trips which presented both our route recommendations and the top results from Google Maps. Regardless of their selected route, we found that between 40\% to 58\% of drivers deviated from recommended routes, citing reasons such as real-time visual information as well as various comfort, safety, and road reliability factors. We also recruited drivers to drive through our entire route recommendation end-to-end to assess the driving suitability compared to their typical route. We found that our route recommendations and their driving suitability closely resemble what drivers experienced in their trips. However, they noted sections of their trips with both static and temporal factors that contribute negatively to comfort and safety, such as time-based presence of pedestrians or vehicles, or undetected surface irregularities. In the future, we recommend a more refined comfort and safety scoring mechanism: exploring state-of-the-art segmentation techniques, adding more class labels, possibly using a multi-modal approach with IMU data, as well as taking into account more factors such as differing vehicle types, real estate pricing, or crime index for route areas.

Abstract Format

html

Language

English

Upload Full Text

wf_yes

2022_Obaldo_ApprovalsAndConsent.pdf (1008 kB)
Approval sheets and ETD consent form

2020_Obaldo_TitlePage.pdf (38 kB)
Title Page

2022_Obaldo_Abstract.pdf (48 kB)
Abstract and keywords

2022_Obaldo_Acknowledgements.pdf (48 kB)
Acknowledgements

2022_Obaldo_TableOfContentsAndLists.pdf (57 kB)
Table of contents, list of tables and figures

2022_Obaldo_Chapter1.pdf (81 kB)
Introduction

2022_Obaldo_Chapter2.pdf (688 kB)
Review of Related Literature

2022_Obaldo_Chapter3.pdf (679 kB)
Theoretical Framework

2022_Obaldo_Chapter4.pdf (935 kB)
Research Methodology

2022_Obaldo_Chapter5.pdf (1157 kB)
The Driving Suitability Dataset

2022_Obaldo_Chapter6.pdf (4425 kB)
Modeling Comfort and Safety

2022_Obaldo_Chapter7.pdf (3709 kB)
Routing System Design

2022_Obaldo_Chapter8.pdf (3350 kB)
Field Study

2022_Obaldo_Chapter9.pdf (51 kB)
Conclusion and Future Work

2022_Obaldo_Appendix.pdf (1220 kB)
Research Ethics Documents

2022_Obaldo_References.pdf (606 kB)
References

Embargo Period

7-2-2022

Share

COinS