Date of Publication

7-2023

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy (Ladderized)

Subject Categories

Philosophy

College

College of Liberal Arts

Department/Unit

Philosophy

Thesis Advisor

Jeremiah Joven B. Joaquin

Defense Panel Chair

Napoleon M. Mabaquiao, Jr

Defense Panel Member

Maxell Lowell C. Aranilla
Hazel T. Biana
Mark Anthony L. Dacela
Ganshman T. Mansukhani

Abstract/Summary

Internalism asserts that there is an internal and necessary connection between our moral judgments and motivation, indicating that moral judgments motivate one to act accordingly. In contrast, Externalism posits that this connection is external and contingent, suggesting that Amoralists make sincere moral judgments without any corresponding motivation to act. This study proposes an Internalist account of moral motivation. To effectively defend Internalism against the Amoralist position, it suggests integrating a Humean framework of motivation with the concepts of moral obligation presented by Christine Korsgaard in the Sources of Normativity (1992) or Stephen Darwall in the Second-Personal Standpoint (2006). Sincere moral judgments are formed when we deliberate in a first-personal (FP) (Korsgaard) or second-personal (SP) (Darwall) perspective. As such, the motivational force is embedded in the moral judgment and comes from an internal desire to uphold the demands of morality to act as we morally should. In this regard, Amoralists do not satisfy the necessary conditions for making moral judgments in the FP or SP perspective. Even if we grant the possibility of Amoralists, it does not constitute an argument against Internalism.

Abstract Format

html

Language

English

Format

Electronic

Physical Description

176 leaves

Keywords

Moral motivation; Judgment (Ethics); Externalism (Philosophy of mind); Internalism (Theory of knowledge)

Upload Full Text

wf_yes

Embargo Period

7-25-2023

Download

Share

COinS