"Whose power is it anyway? Determining the jurisdiction of the Philippi" by Raziele R. Rañeses

Whose power is it anyway? Determining the jurisdiction of the Philippine competition commission and the energy regulatory commission over competition issues in the electric power industry and its effect on the culture in the generation sector

Date of Publication

4-30-2018

Document Type

Master's Thesis

Degree Name

Juris Doctor

Subject Categories

Power and Energy

College

College of Law

Department/Unit

Law

Thesis Adviser

Johanna Sunga-Tagal

Defense Panel Chair

Francis Jeanne Sarmiento

Defense Panel Member

Anthony Goquinco
Samantha Poblacion

Abstract/Summary

The passage of the much-anticipated Philippine Competition Act brings the promise of economic efficiency and a healthy market environment that will pave the way to a highly developed economy. The private sector applauds the effort of the National Legislature to finally unify the sectoral antitrust regulations into a one comprehensive compilation of specific rules and regulations that will govern all the industries in the country. The fusion of all antitrust regulations provides a structured economic and legal review of activities that unduly restrain trade such as price discrimination, monopoly, abuse of market power and illegal mergers and acquisitions. Philippine Competition Commission (PCC), an administrative body that possesses quasi-judicial powers, has been created by the law to guarantee that the interests of the public are protected from unfair trade practices that produce a substantial disparity in the distribution of income, wealth and commercial prospects.

However, despite the promise of effectivity of enforcement, the Competition Act faces a challenge in dealing with vested sector regulations when it comes to the intersecting powers and functions over competition matters. This grapple of power is best concretized by the jurisdictional overlap between the Philippine Competition Commission and the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC), a sector regulator in the energy industry. The issue of lack of delineation of powers between the two administrative bodies lies at the heart of this study. This study has examined and determined the powers and functions of the two agencies to be able to illustrate that there is an overlap of powers and how having two regulatory commissions lead to confusion to the industry players when it comes to reportorial requirement.

It is found that indeed there is an overlap, especially when it comes to the scope of application, and that the industry behaviour is shaped by the laws, their social obligation to the public and their established practices. To be able to clearly define their powers and functions, a Memorandum of Agreement shall be executed, outlining that PCC’s role is merely to review mergers and acquisitions while ERC is to continue to rule on technical and economic matters, while being conferred some competition law enforcement for efficient disposition of cases. In relation to such, industry players are highly encouraged to create cooperation and consultation framework with the two bodies so that there will a comprehensive review in the disposition of their cases.

Abstract Format

html

Note

On the title page: A Master's thesis proposal

Language

English

Format

Electronic

Accession Number

CDTG00728

Shelf Location

Archives, The Learning Common's, 12F Henry Sy Sr. Hall

Physical Description

1 computer optical disc; 4 3/4 in.

Keywords

Electric utilities—Law and legislation--Philippines

Upload Full Text

wf_no

Embargo Period

10-29-2024

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS