Date of Publication
4-1965
Document Type
Master's Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts in Education Major in Religious Education
Subject Categories
Religious Education
College
Br. Andrew Gonzalez FSC College of Education
Department/Unit
Counseling and Educational Psychology
Abstract/Summary
The availability of all kinds of books at every corner and drug store, easily accessible to students, has led some educators to believe that schools have led some educators to believe that schools have the responsibility to teach their students how to read dangerous, difficult fiction intelligently. This mode of action among some educators is rejected by a conservative group that sees graver dangers for the students in reading the normally problematic modern novel.
The purpose of this paper is to study and present the principal issues involved in the controversy. An evaluation of the arguments of both sides will be made and a conclusion will be drawn up based on the mind of the Church in these matters. The study takes a kind of comparison between the prepositions put up by both the conservative and the modern mod.es of thought. I have limited myself to the views of four eminent Catholic critic and educators whom I believe are representative of their group. Their opinions on the problem have been repeatedly voiced out in our leading Catholic periodicals in over the last twenty-five years. Some facts concerning these authorities follow presently to show 'their active role in the field of education and literature.
Abstract Format
html
Language
English
Format
Accession Number
TG00011
Shelf Location
Archives, The Learning Commons, 12F, Henry Sy Sr. Hall
Keywords
Religion and literature; Literature--Study and teaching (Secondary)
Upload Full Text
wf_yes
Recommended Citation
Dabalus, M. (1965). A study of the arguments for and against teaching controversial literature in high school. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6494
Embargo Period
4-25-2022