Date of Publication
9-2020
Document Type
Master's Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts in Philosophy
Subject Categories
Philosophy
College
College of Liberal Arts
Department/Unit
Philosophy
Thesis Adviser
Napoleon M. Mabaquiao, Jr.
Defense Panel Chair
Robert James M. Boyles
Defense Panel Member
Jeremiah Joven B. Joaquin
Victorino Raymundo T. Lualhati
Abstract/Summary
This research paper aims to make a modest contribution to the development of philosophical scholarship by inquiring into the soundness of a strong argument defending physicalism from one of its strong challenges: the Ability Hypothesis (AH), which was advanced by David Lewis and vigorously defended by Laurence Nemirow; and the said challenge to physicalism refers to the Knowledge Argument (KA), which was advanced by Frank Jackson. It must be noted that AH can be viewed from two different perspectives, and thus can be interpreted as either: (1) a defense of physicalism or (2) a critique of KA. The difference in these perspectives is important as this research paper uses (2), and thus its arguments only work within the context that AH is a critique of, or an objection to, KA. To do this, AH is examined by qualifying the differences between the conceptions of phenomenal knowledge or qualia as assumed in both KA and AH. For AH to succeed as an objection to KA, it must, first and foremost, faithfully represent the concepts and views put forth by KA. This research paper argues that AH fails in this area as it commits the straw man fallacy by misinterpreting the supposed meaning of “phenomenal knowledge” as put forth by the KA, which allows for possible formulations of the AH showing the fallacy of equivocation, because KA’s original concept of “phenomenal knowledge” was not properly disproved. It must also be noted that this paper is not a defense of KA, for while AH may not be successful in discrediting KA in the context that this paper views it, there may be other insurmountable difficulties that KA faces.
Abstract Format
html
Language
English
Format
Electronic
Physical Description
110 leaves
Keywords
Ability; Hypothesis
Upload Full Text
wf_yes
Recommended Citation
Oquias, I. M. (2020). A critical examination of the ability hypothesis. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5951
Embargo Period
4-25-2022