Study on the cause-and-effect relationships among the different perspectives of the balanced scorecard in selected listed firms of the Philippines
Date of Publication
2017
Document Type
Master's Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science in Accountancy
College
Ramon V. Del Rosario College of Business
Department/Unit
Accountancy
Thesis Adviser
Arnel O. Onesimo Uy
Defense Panel Chair
Joy S. Rabo
Defense Panel Member
Brixen S. Barredo
Katherine Sobremonte
Brian C. Gozun
Abstract/Summary
The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) framework was introduced by Kaplan and Norton more than two decades ago in the corporate environment. Ever since its introduction as a performance measurement tool in most organizations, skepticism regarding its applicability and cause-and-effect relationships among the four different perspectives still arise. Annual reports of publicly listed firms in the Philippines include only financial measures as key performance indicators. The study aims to test if the three non-financial BSC perspectives (learning and growth, internal business processes, and customer) have a significant effect on the financial perspective of listed Philippine firms in the Philippine Stock Exchange. Ordinary least-squares regression is used for the purpose of this study. This study finds that all three non-financial perspectives have significant effects on financial perspective.
Abstract Format
html
Language
English
Format
Electronic
Accession Number
CDTG007078
Shelf Location
Archives, The Learning Commons, 12F Henry Sy Sr. Hall
Physical Description
1 computer disc ; 4 3/4 in.
Keywords
Balanced scorecard (Management); Organizational effectiveness--Measurement
Recommended Citation
Lim, P. A. (2017). Study on the cause-and-effect relationships among the different perspectives of the balanced scorecard in selected listed firms of the Philippines. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5746