Date of Publication

10-2013

Document Type

Master's Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science in Industrial Relations Management

Subject Categories

Law

College

Ramon V. Del Rosario College of Business

Department/Unit

Commercial Law

Thesis Adviser

Michael David B. Azucena

Defense Panel Chair

James Keith C. Heffron

Defense Panel Member

Andre R. De Jesus
Rex Enrico V. Cruz

Abstract/Summary

The evolution of mechanisms designed to resolve industrial and labor disputes from the Court of Industrial Relations established under CA No. 103 (1936) to the current system under the Labor Code (P.D. No. 442 as amended) has resulted in a web of intricate and often overlapping jurisdictions which is continuously plagued by perceptions of inefficiency, ineffectiveness and complication. Thus, the perceived failure of the present system of labor dispute settlement system is characterized by unnecessary delay and corruption.

The study attempts to examine both the policy and mechanism of the labor dispute settlement system in the Philippines and it further attempts to find existing ADR law and Arbitration law and other related laws, policies, programs and jurisprudence that will serve as the forefront of this argument in favor of implementing a holistic and comprehensive ADR approach to the problems besting our industrial and labor dispute resolution system, thus maximizing the policy of the State to actively promote party autonomy and the use of various modes of ADR to make their own arrangement in the resolution of dispute with the greatest cooperation of and the least intervention from the court.

Abstract Format

html

Language

English

Format

Electronic

Accession Number

CDTG005489

Shelf Location

Archives, The Learning Commons, 12F Henry Sy Sr. Hall

Physical Description

104 leaves

Keywords

Dispute resolution (Law)—Philippines

Upload Full Text

wf_yes

Download

Share

COinS