A mereotopological investigation of borders: A study in formal ontology
Date of Publication
2013
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy
College
College of Liberal Arts
Department/Unit
Philosophy
Thesis Adviser
Jeremiah Joven B. Joaquin
Defense Panel Chair
Napoleon Mabaquiao, Jr.
Defense Panel Member
Noelle Leslie Dela Cruz
Dennis Apolega
Charmaine Misalucha
Gansham Mansukhani
Abstract/Summary
In formal ontology, the terms boundaries and borders are interchangeable. Their usage and definition are assumed to be completely identical. The studys task is to challenge that assumption. The study provides an investigation of their distinction. The author explains this distinction using naive argumentation and formal ontology, and demonstrates it in terms of usage and reference. A distinction between their orientation and symmetry is also provided. This study holds that a border is an entity which: coincides with the boundaries of the wholes it dissects must coincide in either total or incongruent fashion and is not a proper part of anything. The dissertation explores the property relations of borders, such as location, parthood, boundaries, ontological dependence, and kinds and argues for the following: first, a border is located at the same space that the coinciding boundaries of the wholes they dissect are located second, a border is not a part of the whole nor the latters boundaries third, a wholes boundaries are also not parts of any border. and fourth, borders arise only in social fiats and not in individual fiats.
Abstract Format
html
Language
English
Format
Electronic
Electronic File Format
MS WORD
Accession Number
CDTG005545
Shelf Location
Archives, The Learning Commons, 12F Henry Sy Sr. Hall
Physical Description
leaves ; 4 3/4 in.
Recommended Citation
Palces, K. M. (2013). A mereotopological investigation of borders: A study in formal ontology. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/370
Upload Full Text
wf_no