The Lockean approach to the problem of universals: A question of adequacy

Date of Publication

2009

Document Type

Bachelor's Thesis

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts Major in Philosophy

Subject Categories

Philosophy

College

College of Liberal Arts

Department/Unit

Philosophy

Thesis Adviser

Jeremiah Joven B. Joaquin

Defense Panel Chair

Ernest Geir Villacorta

Defense Panel Member

Napoleon Mabaquiao
Dennis D.G. Apolega

Abstract/Summary

This thesis paper aims to prove that John Locke's theory of ideas and words is an adequate solution to the problem of universals. We arrive at this by identifying a non-arbitrary, indiscriminate set of criteria, that would prove a particular theory as an adequate solution to the problem of universals e.g. logical consistency, philosophical soundness, and explanatory power. We are to not only put this set of criteria in application to John Locke's theory, but also to others' as well. And it is because the ideational theory passes not one, not two, but all three criteria that we are able to conclude that it is an adequate solution to the problem of universals. Moreover, it is because we are to put Locke's theory in comparison with other theories, that are directed to the problem of universals, that we are able to infer that -to some extent-his theory is the best solution available to us.

Abstract Format

html

Language

English

Format

Print

Accession Number

TU15063

Shelf Location

Archives, The Learning Commons, 12F, Henry Sy Sr. Hall

Physical Description

72 leaves ; 28 cm.

Keywords

Knowledge; Theory of; Idea (Philosophy); Universals (Philosophy)

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS