We are legitimate, what about our rights?: The moratorium on logging and the legitimate logging companies contractual rights
Date of Publication
2011
Document Type
Bachelor's Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Science in Commerce Major in Legal Management
Subject Categories
Commercial Law
College
Ramon V. Del Rosario College of Business
Department/Unit
Commercial Law
Thesis Adviser
Jocelyn P. Cruz
Defense Panel Member
Antonio A. Ligon
Lily Ann M. Padaen
Jose C. Reyes
Abstract/Summary
The study examined whether the moratorium on logging deprives the legitimate players of the logging industry of their contractual rights. Using the non-impairment clause of contracts, involvement of national interest and exercise of police power as sub-issues, the study concludes that there is no deprivation of contractual rights in the issuance of the moratorium on logging. It is highly recommended that there ne uniformity in implementing Executive Order no. 23, urge the DENR to hasten the review of all forest agreements/contracts, and provide alternative sources of livelihood to laid off workers.
Abstract Format
html
Language
English
Format
Accession Number
TU19631
Shelf Location
Archives, The Learning Commons, 12F, Henry Sy Sr. Hall
Physical Description
43, [16 unnumbered] leaves : illustrations (some colored)
Recommended Citation
Penalosa, G. D., & Villaverde, M. T. (2011). We are legitimate, what about our rights?: The moratorium on logging and the legitimate logging companies contractual rights. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/17817
