Roman Catholic and Buddhist Religious Healing Compared: Practices, Source of Healing Power and Perceived Efficacy
Date of Publication
2012
Document Type
Bachelor's Thesis
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts Major in Psychology
Subject Categories
Psychology
College
College of Liberal Arts
Department/Unit
Psychology
Thesis Adviser
Laurene Chua-Garcia
Defense Panel Member
Jose Maria Diestro
Abstract/Summary
The study compared healers of Buddhist and Roman Catholic religious affiliations in terms of their practices, source of power, and perceived efficacy. A qualitative approach was applied using in-depth interviews to obtain meaningful data. Twelve participants took part in the study -- three (3) Roman Catholic patients, three (3) Roman Catholic healers, and six (6) Buddhist practitioners. Data analysis was done via the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis perspective. The study found that differences exist not only between the two groups but within the groups as well. Between and within groups, practices, processes, source of power and the use of materials all varied. It turned out that unlike the Roman Catholics, Buddhists do not have healers but believe in the concept of self-healing. While the healing process of the Roman Catholics employ more physical means [e.g. laying of hands], the Buddhists look more to controlling the mind [e.g. meditation].
Abstract Format
html
Language
English
Format
Accession Number
TU19776
Shelf Location
Archives, The Learning Commons, 12F, Henry Sy Sr. Hall
Physical Description
172 leaves ; 28 cm.
Keywords
Spiritual healing; Healing--Religious aspects--Christianity; Religious life--Buddhism; Healing--Religious aspects--Buddhism
Recommended Citation
Aberin, R. P., Castaneda, E. T., & Magsanoc, M. B. (2012). Roman Catholic and Buddhist Religious Healing Compared: Practices, Source of Healing Power and Perceived Efficacy. Retrieved from https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_bachelors/10520
Embargo Period
12-2-2021