The Moderating Effect of User Experience Duration on the Relationship Between Usability and Safety Outcomes of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices Among Diabetic Patients in Metro Manila

Document Types

Paper Presentation

Research Theme (for Paper Presentation and Poster Presentation submissions only)

Food, Nutrition, and Health (FNH)

School Name

National University - MOA

Track or Strand

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)

Research Advisor (Last Name, First Name, Middle Initial)

Palero, Elton John & Marticio, Jordan Austin O.

Start Date

25-6-2026 10:30 AM

End Date

25-6-2026 12:00 PM

Zoom Link/ Room Assignment

Online - Zoom Link: https://zoom.us/j/92594857524 Meeting ID: 925 9485 7524 | Passcode: research

Abstract/Executive Summary

Diabetes mellitus continues to challenge global health due to its rising prevalence and long-term complications, requiring consistent self-management. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices provide real-time glycemic insights, yet their effectiveness in supporting patient safety depends on usability and user experience. This quantitative moderated correlational study investigates the relationship between usability and safety outcomes of CGM devices among diabetic patients and examines whether user experience duration moderates this relationship. A total of thirty-two (32) Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients aged 20-79 in Metro Manila, using CGM devices for at least one month, completed validated questionnaires assessing user experience duration and their perceptions of device usability and safety outcomes. Data was analyzed using Spearman’s correlation and regression to examine the relationship between usability and safety outcomes, while moderation and simple slope analysis were conducted to assess whether this relationship varies across levels of user experience duration. Findings revealed that respondents generally perceived CGM devices as both usable and safe. Moderation analyses showed no significant effects for either frequency of interaction or duration in years. Simple slope analyses indicated that usability consistently predicts safety outcomes across all levels of interaction and duration. Overall, findings indicate that usability of CGM devices plays a crucial role in ensuring patient safety, regardless of how long or how frequently patients have used the device. Furthermore, future research could explore broader populations, focus on affordable and specific brands of CGM devices, or examine additional factors that may influence safety outcomes to strengthen understanding of effective utilization.

Keywords

Diabetes, Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device, safety outcomes, usability, user experience

Statement of Originality

yes

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jun 25th, 10:30 AM Jun 25th, 12:00 PM

The Moderating Effect of User Experience Duration on the Relationship Between Usability and Safety Outcomes of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices Among Diabetic Patients in Metro Manila

Diabetes mellitus continues to challenge global health due to its rising prevalence and long-term complications, requiring consistent self-management. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices provide real-time glycemic insights, yet their effectiveness in supporting patient safety depends on usability and user experience. This quantitative moderated correlational study investigates the relationship between usability and safety outcomes of CGM devices among diabetic patients and examines whether user experience duration moderates this relationship. A total of thirty-two (32) Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients aged 20-79 in Metro Manila, using CGM devices for at least one month, completed validated questionnaires assessing user experience duration and their perceptions of device usability and safety outcomes. Data was analyzed using Spearman’s correlation and regression to examine the relationship between usability and safety outcomes, while moderation and simple slope analysis were conducted to assess whether this relationship varies across levels of user experience duration. Findings revealed that respondents generally perceived CGM devices as both usable and safe. Moderation analyses showed no significant effects for either frequency of interaction or duration in years. Simple slope analyses indicated that usability consistently predicts safety outcomes across all levels of interaction and duration. Overall, findings indicate that usability of CGM devices plays a crucial role in ensuring patient safety, regardless of how long or how frequently patients have used the device. Furthermore, future research could explore broader populations, focus on affordable and specific brands of CGM devices, or examine additional factors that may influence safety outcomes to strengthen understanding of effective utilization.

https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/conf_shsrescon/2026/BoA_FNH/8