Title

Beall-ing

College

College of Liberal Arts

Department/Unit

Philosophy

Document Type

Article

Source Title

Logic and Logical Philosophy

Volume

29

Issue

2

First Page

213

Last Page

221

Publication Date

6-1-2020

Abstract

In “A neglected reply to Prior’s dilemma” Beall [2012] presents a Weak Kleene framework where Prior’s dilemma for Hume’s no-ought-from-is thesis fails. It fails in the framework because addition, the inference rule that one of its horns relies on, is invalid. In this paper, we show that a more general result is necessary for the viability of Beall’s proposal - a result, which implies that Hume’s thesis holds in the proposed framework. We prove this result and thus show that Beall’s proposal is indeed viable. © 2019 by Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń

html

Digitial Object Identifier (DOI)

10.12775/LLP.2019.028

Disciplines

Philosophy

Keywords

Logic; Jc Beall, David Hume; Weak Kleene

Upload File

wf_yes

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS