Navigating Ambiguity: An In-Depth Exploration of Situationships in Contemporary Romantic Relationships

Document Types

Paper Presentation

School Name

Berkeley School Inc.

Track or Strand

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)

Research Advisor (Last Name, First Name, Middle Initial)

Astudillo, Alfonso III B.

Start Date

25-6-2025 1:00 PM

End Date

25-6-2025 2:30 PM

Zoom Link/ Room Assignment

https://zoom.us/j/94367113506?pwd=m4trayXxy1UGcK9rPm1Y1tMn95FZKy.1 Meeting ID: 943 6711 3506 Passcode: LCS-RESCON

Abstract/Executive Summary

This qualitative study examined the phenomenon of situationships, which is defined as a romantic involvement that lacks clear commitment, boundaries, and labels. Situationships have surfaced in the context of modern dating culture with the rise of dating apps, in which people may display behaviors typical of couples but are contradictory to their traditional definitions of romantic relationships. This study explored the characteristics that define situationships, how people manage their inherent ambiguity, and why individuals prefer situationships over traditional established relationships. The data was gathered through in-depth interviews and an inductive thematic analysis of participants' experiences. The results revealed that open communication and natural development were significant, where participants preferred the flexibility and less pressure that situationships offer as opposed to traditional relationships; for most, this allowed them personal growth and emotional exploration with fewer bounded expectations. The major indicators of situationships include a lack of clear labels, low commitment, and a general sense of uncertainty. Throughout a situationship, individuals often balance personal autonomy and emotional intimacy, maintaining their bond through verbal and non-verbal communication strategies to affirm their feelings and understanding. This study indicated how situationships have similarities with the traditional concept of a relationship, primarily emphasizing mutual respect and open communication. Overall, this research helped provide a clearer understanding of relationships in contemporary society by clarifying the motivations behind individuals’ choices to engage in situationships as an alternative to more conventional forms of relationships and also highlights how individuals navigate the complexities of modern-day relationships.

Keywords

situationships; traditional; communication; romantic relationships; commitment

Research Theme (for Paper Presentation and Poster Presentation submissions only)

Living Culture and Contemporary Societies (LCS)

Statement of Originality

yes

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jun 25th, 1:00 PM Jun 25th, 2:30 PM

Navigating Ambiguity: An In-Depth Exploration of Situationships in Contemporary Romantic Relationships

This qualitative study examined the phenomenon of situationships, which is defined as a romantic involvement that lacks clear commitment, boundaries, and labels. Situationships have surfaced in the context of modern dating culture with the rise of dating apps, in which people may display behaviors typical of couples but are contradictory to their traditional definitions of romantic relationships. This study explored the characteristics that define situationships, how people manage their inherent ambiguity, and why individuals prefer situationships over traditional established relationships. The data was gathered through in-depth interviews and an inductive thematic analysis of participants' experiences. The results revealed that open communication and natural development were significant, where participants preferred the flexibility and less pressure that situationships offer as opposed to traditional relationships; for most, this allowed them personal growth and emotional exploration with fewer bounded expectations. The major indicators of situationships include a lack of clear labels, low commitment, and a general sense of uncertainty. Throughout a situationship, individuals often balance personal autonomy and emotional intimacy, maintaining their bond through verbal and non-verbal communication strategies to affirm their feelings and understanding. This study indicated how situationships have similarities with the traditional concept of a relationship, primarily emphasizing mutual respect and open communication. Overall, this research helped provide a clearer understanding of relationships in contemporary society by clarifying the motivations behind individuals’ choices to engage in situationships as an alternative to more conventional forms of relationships and also highlights how individuals navigate the complexities of modern-day relationships.

https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/conf_shsrescon/2025/paper_lcs/9