Document Type
Paper presentation
School Name
Canada National High School
School Code
ARCH00041
Abstract / Executive Summary
This study seeks to improve teacher punctuality by focusing on the causes of tardiness. It determines the school's suggested strategies to enhance timeliness and evaluates the effectiveness of Project AIM as a remedy for the issue. Purposive sampling was employed to select ten participants for this mixed-method study. Biometrics, unstructured open-ended questionnaire, one-on-one interviews, situation analysis, and project evaluation were used to collect data. These methods included reminding teachers of the consequences of tardiness, reiterating the various laws pertaining to government employees' tardiness, providing time management training, and conducting monthly biometric monitoring. The results of the investigation showed that changes took place both before and after the AIM initiative. According to the school's standards, department heads must talk to teachers about the importance of time and create written unit rules that include a call-in system for teachers who will be late. Additionally, it must give as much notice in advance as is practical. Every department head should also adhere to the corrective action procedure set forth in the DepEd Order and Civil Service standards. Depending on the situation, this procedure may be repeated, expedited, or exempted from penalties like verbal, written, final, and termination warnings.
Keywords:
teacher’s punctuality, tardiness, analysis, implement, monitor
Promoting Teachers’ Punctuality through Project AIM (Analysis, Implement and Monitor)
This study seeks to improve teacher punctuality by focusing on the causes of tardiness. It determines the school's suggested strategies to enhance timeliness and evaluates the effectiveness of Project AIM as a remedy for the issue. Purposive sampling was employed to select ten participants for this mixed-method study. Biometrics, unstructured open-ended questionnaire, one-on-one interviews, situation analysis, and project evaluation were used to collect data. These methods included reminding teachers of the consequences of tardiness, reiterating the various laws pertaining to government employees' tardiness, providing time management training, and conducting monthly biometric monitoring. The results of the investigation showed that changes took place both before and after the AIM initiative. According to the school's standards, department heads must talk to teachers about the importance of time and create written unit rules that include a call-in system for teachers who will be late. Additionally, it must give as much notice in advance as is practical. Every department head should also adhere to the corrective action procedure set forth in the DepEd Order and Civil Service standards. Depending on the situation, this procedure may be repeated, expedited, or exempted from penalties like verbal, written, final, and termination warnings.
